Results from the competition between BLISSTOOL, Nexus and Golden Mask on polygon OVERLOAD. Opinion of BLISSTOOL:
Although the competition was officially, unfortunately, it was conducted very unprofessional, without complying with the regulation to bring order and objectivity, mostly because of the accumulated tension between the three competing manufacturers (Ahmed Merchev - BLISSTOOL, Georgi Chaoushev - Nexus, Vladimir Lilov - Golden Mask), which apparently escalated during the competition.
However, in the official tests are easy to spot the following facts:
/1/ In the official test in highly mineralized soil on polygon OVERLOAD, the only detector that detects coin 24.25mm (50 euro cent) at a depth of 20 cm with categorical color (non-ferrous) signal, including detecting of the detected object of 360 degrees, and this repeatedly, is metal detector BLISSTOOL LTC64X (THE BEAST) v6.
/2/ In the official test in highly mineralized soil on polygon OVERLOAD, the only detector that detects coin 24.25mm (50 euro cent) at a depth of 20 cm, while it was consistently tested by two independent searchers and personal by the three competing manufacturers (Ahmed Merchev - BLISSTOOL, Georgi Chaoushev - Nexus, Vladimir Lilov - Golden Mask), is metal detector BLISSTOOL LTC64X (THE BEAST) v6.
/3/ In the official test in medium mineralized soil near polygon OVERLOAD, the only detector that detects categorically coin 24.25mm (50 euro cent) at a depth of 42 cm in full discrimination mode, and this repeatedly with a powerful audible sound, so to be detected in real search on terrain, is metal detector BLISSTOOL LTC64X (THE BEAST) v5. The detection was carried out at all gain levels - from the minimum (GAIN = about 2-3) to the maximum (GAIN = about 5-8-MAX).
/4/ In the official test in medium mineralized soil near polygon OVERLOAD, the only detector that detects categorically coin 24.25mm (50 euro cent) at a depth of 42 cm in full discrimination mode, and this repeatedly with a powerful audible sound, while it was consistently tested by the three competing manufacturers (Ahmed Merchev - BLISSTOOL, Georgi Chaoushev - Nexus, Vladimir Lilov - Golden Mask), is metal detector BLISSTOOL LTC64X (THE BEAST) v5.
/5/ In the official test in medium mineralized soil near polygon OVERLOAD, Georgi Chaoushev - Nexus, with the best and most expensive metal detector of Nexus - Nexus Standard MKII, detect with a very quiet and subtle sound a coin 24.25mm (50 euro cent) at a depth of 42 cm in all metals mode without explicit discrimination. Since the detected signal was very weak, probably in real search on terrain, this signal will be missed. Given this fact, Georgi Chaoushev - Nexus try to increase the gain of the detector to improve the detection, but the detector began to give false signals over the terrain and was unusable even on the polygon, i.e. in medium mineralized soil, Nexus Standard MKII is practically usable only with minimum gain. The same metal detector, ie Nexus Standard MKII, even with minimum gain, in the official tests in highly mineralized soil on polygon OVERLOAD, issuing false signals continuously from the mineralized stones on the soil (this is the official opinion of Georgi Chaoushev - Nexus) and it was very noisy in this soil. In this regard, in Bulgarian language, the official name of this metal detector fits to be read and understood as a joke: MKII = MaKa II = GRIEF II.
/6/ In the official test in medium mineralized soil near polygon OVERLOAD, Vladimir Lilov - Golden Mask, with the newest and best metal detector of Golden Mask - Golden Mask 4W D (THE MONSTER) did not detect coin 24.25mm (50 euro cent) at a depth of 42 cm, and even there were no early signs of detection - there was complete silence. Given that in this test, the same result will have and the next best metal detector of Golden Mask - Golden Mask 4 Pro, Vladimir Lilov admitted during the official test to all present that he can not detect the coin and officially left the test as lost and defeated, i.e. THE MONSTER curled tail and disappeared. According to Ahmed Merchev - BLISSTOOL, the soil where the test was conducted is with a medium degree of mineralization, but according to Vladimir Lilov - Golden Mask, the soil where the test was conducted is with low degree of mineralization. If assuming that Vladimir Lilov - Golden Mask is right for his formal supposition for the mineralization of the soil, it means that the latest and best metal detectors of Golden Mask, are unable to detect a large coin (about 24 mm) to 42 cm in the ground, even in soil with a low degree of mineralization. With all things considered, a proper name for a metal detector Golden Mask 4W D is not THE MONSTER, but THE PUPPY.
As evidence of the above facts presented, pending publication of the video of the official tests captured by BLISSTOOL during the competition. Our competitors quickly posted video recordings of the competition, but they mainly stressed at times compromising BLISSTOOL, in an attempt to divert attention from the actual results.
The above presented facts makes or not BLISSTOOL LTC64X (THE BEAST) winner in the official tests in highly mineralized soil and in the official tests at medium mineralized soil?, i.e. the above presented facts makes or nor BLISSTOOL winner in the official competition between BLISSTOOL, Nexus and Golden Mask on polygon OVERLOAD? I leave you alone to answer.
Best Regards,
Ahmed Merchev, BLISSTOOLStatistics: Posted by BLISSTOOL — Tue Jun 10, 2014 4:01 pm
]]>